Perhaps we should have seen these performances coming. At the beginning of the month Silva put in a phenomenal performance against
It was always going to be billed a David vs. Goliath contest. Whichever way the media framed the result, we were always going to be loser. A win, and it would be business as usual, nothing special, almost an after thought. Lose, and we would be a slain giant. This is the way it is going to be for many of our games this season. In terms of the respective structures of both clubs, the David/Goliath comparison certainly worked. But on the pitch, it was
It was a strange encounter.
It was into this supposed mis-match that David Silva stepped. It turned out to be an inspired substitution by Roberto Mancini. We were an altogether different threat with the Spaniard on the field and, perhaps understandably, Holloway’s men couldn’t handle him. Silva immediately produced the cross for Tevez to nick in – the finish itself an excellent piece of skill even if the goal looked slightly offside.
Then of course came the moment (much like Robinho’s stunning chip against Arsenal) that I will always feel was the moment David Silva arrived at
Posnan
Starting against Polish outfit Lech Posnan in the Europa League, in an attacking sense Silva was at the centre of everything good that we did. He linked the midfield with the attack superbly, and provided crosses for two of Emmanuel Adebayor’s three goals – allowing the
Arsenal
Silva was the best thing about what turned into a frustrating encounter with Arsene Wenger’s men. It was always going to be hard for us after Dedryck Boyata was sent from the field of play for taking out Marouane Chamakh, but even at 0-2 I still felt we had a great chance to get something out of the game. As a City fan this feeling is something that has been alien to me ever since I supported the club. Usually it’s the other way around – you fear that the team might throw away what looks like an unassailable lead, but its players like David Silva that are changing this mentality.
Once again, the Spaniard was at the centre of all our quality attacking play. In the opening minutes a deft Silva back heel from a Tevez cross almost secured us the lead only for the alert Lukasz Fabianski to deny us. Then at 1-0 down the Spaniard almost changed the outlook of the game with a twisting and turning run into the Arsenal penalty area, only for Fabianski to be equal once again. You certainly felt at 1-1 we could even go on and win the game, but in the end it was not to be and the Gunners efficiently closed the game out.
Even though he is known on the world stage, English teams are still getting to grips with the threat of David Silva. But the Spaniard has now had his ‘Robinho moment’, and the key will be to see how he reacts once teams start to get a handle on him. Will the Spaniard thrive where the Brazilian so spectacularly failed? The answer to this question will have a major bearing on whether or not City fans will look back at the 2010/11 campaign as a success.
i don't know with the other big signings of City this year but Silva is definitely the real deal!
ReplyDeletehe is worth every cent City is paying him!
Completely agree Andrei! I think what marks Silva out - particularly from the likes of Robinho is the fact that he's a much more flexible forward. Robinho was often stuck out on the wing, whereas Silva is allowed to drift in advanced positions across the opposition defence. This allows him to get much more involved in our build up play. He's also much more industrious than Robinho and wants to get involved much more. A final point too, Silva is able to perform the drifting forward role because of his strength. He hardly ever seems to get dispossessed. Robinho wouldn't have been effective here because he was too easily pushed off the ball.
ReplyDeleteJamie Pollock, one of the most gifted footballers, you must be joking, a complete tosser !!!!
ReplyDeleteAnon - see poll above right. 10% of all voters back Pollack! Maybe they too are all tossers?!
ReplyDelete